Tuesday, July 24, 2007

Ohio Payday Loan Lenders: Helpful or Harmful?

By Paul Rizzo
Payday Loan Writer

After successfully tackling predatory Ohio mortgage lending, advocates for the poor are taking aim at payday lenders whose numbers have grown more than tenfold in ten years - from 107 in 1996 to 1,562 in 2006.

But gaining support in the legislature for state regulation will be a challenge. Sen. Ray Miller can’t even find a consensus among fellow Democrats in inner-city Columbus.

Miller has repeatedly proposed legislation to cap fees and limit the number of faxless payday loans per person.

House Democratic Leader Joyce Beatty, who represents some of the same citizens as Miller, said she has talked to people in line waiting to get payday loans.

No Credit Payday Loans “People said to me, ‘Rep. Beatty, these folks will at least cash my check.’ One lady told me she couldn’t get her check cashed in any bank in the city,” Beatty said. “I have not had anybody call me and say, ‘I go to a payday lending establishment, and I think you should close them down.’ ”

Some people believe that the demand for short-term, high-interest personal loans shows the need for such businesses, said Bill Faith, executive director of the Coalition on Homelessness and Housing in Ohio. “Part of that need is totally inflated because people get in a cycle they can’t get out of.”

People often get a payday loan just to pay off a previous one, he said. Interest for a two-week loan is $15 per $100, or $12.50 per $100 over $500 - a 391 percent rate when annualized. Industry leaders say that is a misleading number.

Faith is finding strong support from Rep. Bill Batchelder, a staunch conservative Republican from Medina and the legislature’s most seasoned member. Batchelder has held meetings on the no fax cash advance issue and has been encouraged by some Democrats. Gov. Ted Strickland also is showing interest.

“We’re finding friends all along the political spectrum,” Faith said.

He’s also finding reluctance along the same spectrum. Rep. Christopher R. Widener, a Springfield Republican and chairman of the House Financial Institutions Committee, said he doesn’t see the need to cap rates or make other regulatory changes.

The GOP-controlled legislature last took action on payday advance lending in 2004, boosting the maximum loan amount from $500 to $800.

More than political affiliation, observers say legislators’ views come down to which argument they believe: that payday lenders provide an important service to those with nowhere else to turn, or they trap financially troubled consumers in a spiral of debt.

“Without a doubt, it creates interesting alliances,” said Uriah King, a policy associate with the North Carolina-based Center for Responsive Lending. “We’ve seen very conservative Republicans and very liberal Democrats take unexpected positions.”

Read the rest of this entry »

Monday, July 23, 2007

Arizona Payday Advance Fraud Uncovered

By Paul Rizzo
Payday Loan Writer

Police believe a man arrested at a Chandler payday loan store this week had developed a scheme to cash checks using fake pay stubs and accomplices posing as his employees.

Chandler police said 52-year-old Clifford Jack Chester tried to run the scheme at the Checkmate Payday Loans store on Alma School Road north of Ray Road when he was arrested.

Fraud According to a preliminary police report, here’s how the scam worked:

Chester would recruit accomplices and have them open a checking account in their name with very little money in it. He then would send them into a payday cash advance store to get a cash advance using phony pay stubs he supplied that made the person appear employed. The accomplice would write a check on the account, get a $400 advance then split the money with Chester.

On Wednesday, police were tipped when the store became suspicious of a man trying to cash a check they believed was fraudulent. When officers arrived they stopped the male suspect inside the quick cash loan store and questioned a female suspect waiting in his car.

During questioning, the officer was approached by an employee from the nearby Philly’s Famous restaurant, who said another man was pacing in the restaurant and watching them question the suspects.

According to the report, the man in the restaurant was Chester. After questioning, he admitted he drove the other suspects to the bad credit payday loan store to cash the check. A background check showed Chester was wanted on previous fraud and forgery charges in Scottsdale and Tempe.

Police said Chester gave written consent to have his car searched, where police found a briefcase full of checks, IDs and bogus company documents in his name, along with methamphetamine and prescription drug bottles.

The two accomplices told police that Chester was the “leader of the fake company” and gave police a copy of a cheat sheet for the scam. Police said they found the original in Chester’s shirt pocket.

Chester was arrested on suspicion of criminal impersonation, fraudulent schemes, identity theft and possession of methamphetamine.

Friday, July 20, 2007

Action Taken Against Kansas Payday Loans

By Paul Rizzo
Payday Loan Writer

Last month, the De Soto City Council took action its members hoped would prevent the spread of payday cash loan and title loan companies to the city.

Somehow, the proprietors of such Kansas businesses have overlooked De Soto, although their businesses and the busy, gaudy signs that announce them are common enough in cities that border De Soto to the east and south.

Guaranteed Cash Advance The De Soto City Council is generally receptive to business and the short-term loan industry joins adult entertainment as the only category of business the city has actively attempted to discourage. The preemptive action against instant payday loans probably was much more needed as the city is home a significant underclass population on which the industry thrives.

Those engaged in the faxless payday advance industry maintain they are merely providing a service to consumers shunned by traditional lenders. And it’s true the friendly Mom and Pop store willing to extend credit for groceries or other necessities no longer exists.

But state law allowing cash advances with interest rates of 15 percent, finance charges of $15 and an A.P.R. rate of 390 percent on a 14-day loan of up to $500, consumers walk away with most of their next paychecks that were supposed to repay the loans already spent. That sets them up for an endless cycle of loans that nip away at weekly budgets and it erases any thought of savings for a better future.

It may be a vain hope, but perhaps the absence of the businesses here in De Soto will encourage those who find themselves short at each pay cycle to take advantage of budgeting help offered by different organization, including the De Soto Multi-Service Center, so that they become better educated on how to get the most for their money.

Thursday, July 19, 2007

John Edwards: Down with Payday Advances!

By Paul Rizzo
Payday Loan Writer

Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards, on an eight-state swing to highlight poverty issues, on Tuesday called for a national law to crackdown on predatory cash advance payday loan lending.

John EdwardsWalking through a struggling neighborhood in Cleveland, the nation’s poorest big city, Edwards said that without national regulations predatory lenders who offer higher-priced no faxing payday loans to people with tarnished credit or low incomes “just move to another place where they are not regulated.”

But are people responsible for their own actions?

As an example, consider the newly-instituted “abusive driving” fines in Virginia.  Basically, if you’re caught driving in such a way that endangers other people on the road, you can get fined thousands of dollars.

Such a fine could put a lot of working class people in dire financial straits.  The same sort of dire financial straits people find themselves in when they choose to live beyond their means and facilitate that lifestyle via payday cash advance loans.

In the first instance most would say that the person receiving the fine is suffering the consequences of their actions in not following traffic laws.  Yet in the second instance, the people getting the payday loans are cast as victims.  As if the decision to get the loan in the first place weren’t theirs to make.

It’s something to ponder.

Wednesday, July 18, 2007

South Dakota Lawmaker to Review Payday Loans

By Paul Rizzo
Payday Loan Writer

Payday loans should be part of a state government review, a Deadwood lawmaker says.

Republican Rep. Chuck Turbiville made that recommendation Tuesday as an interim committee began a review of the state Department of Revenue and Regulation.

South Dakota Payday Loans“There’s been a lot in the news about the [online payday loan] rates being charged,” Turbiville said. “Could we get some indication what might be done to regulate, cap, reduce those rates without driving away those credit card companies that came to South Dakota mainly because we do not have any regulation of that?”

Payday loan is a generic term for a relatively short-length, high-interest personal loan. Loans generally run about 30 days, and interest rates can be in triple digits. Lawmakers have made several attempts to regulate the industry in recent years, but a Wall lawmaker said the review process is a chance to see whether more needs to be done.

“A lot of work has been done on that, but the question is, ‘Have we gone far enough?’ ” Republican Rep. Gordon Pederson said.

Paul Kinsman, secretary of the Department of Revenue and Regulation, said his agency would welcome legislative input on that and other issues related to pay day loans.

“The department would be very interested in working with this group to come up with some kind of solution or at least a plan of action with how we’re supported to deal with [fast cash loans],” Kinsman said.

The legislative committee’s review is part of an ongoing attempt to study the workings of each major agency of the executive branch.

Tuesday, July 17, 2007

Payday Loan Company Refutes National Report

By Paul Rizzo
Payday Loan Writer

A recent report issued by the National Consumer Law Center is absent what should be a critical element of any report: the facts.

ACE Cash Express The June 2007 report on utilities and payday advance lenders concludes that there is a link between companies like ACE accepting utility payments and offering short-term loans. According to ACE, the report relies on innuendo, anecdotes, and casual observations to make misleading conclusions.

ACE, a payday loan company, processed over 6.3 million utility and bill-payment transactions during the 12 months ended June 30, 2007. In a sample of 602,524 utility and bill-payment transactions, ACE identified 5,823 customers, or 1%, who also became short-term loan customers on the same day that they paid their bill.

Ninety-nine percent (99%) of ACE customers in this sample were not users of ACE’s short-term loan product on the day that they paid their bill at ACE.

In a report to be issued to ACE’s Board of Directors, Grant Thornton LLP has compared the computations and calculations that ACE used to prepare this cash advance analysis and did not have any exceptions.

“The National Consumer Law Center report fails to present the facts about payday loans and utility payments, and consists of erroneous arguments and false conclusions,” said Jay B. Shipowitz, President and Chief Executive Officer of ACE Cash Express. “The fact of the matter is that these are two separate customer groups with minimal crossover. Our bill payment service is a tremendous convenience and usually a lower cost option to our customers. It is shocking to us that anyone would want to eliminate this convenient and economical service.”

The report confesses that the National Consumer Law Center did not use data to reach their conclusions, when they state:”

“Available data offers no way to measure how many utility bill payers have been put on the road to becoming payday loan customers.”

This statement reveals the fundamental flaw of the report and the danger of drawing conclusions without factual data. Consumers will not be served if their choices in how they make their utility payments are arbitrarily taken away.

California Payday Advance Lender Prohibited from Lending

By Paul Rizzo
Payday Loan Writer

California Corporations Commissioner Preston DuFauchard has determined that Margaret Diego (dba The Cash Center Inc., The Loan Center Inc. and TLC) willfully violated the California Deferred Deposit Transaction Law (CDDTL).

Diego has been ordered to desist and refrain from violating the law, ordered to pay penalties, and the personal loans in question have been declared void. Diego has operated The Cash Center Inc., a payday lender in the city of Reseda in Los Angeles County, without the required license from the California Department of Corporations.

LoansThe investigation by the Department found that Margaret Diego willfully violated sections 23024, 23036, and 23037 of the law by entering into eighty seven (87) deferred deposit transactions with at least 13 separate consumers, in some cases while existing faxless payday loans were still outstanding with those same consumers.

The Commissioner also determined that Diego failed to preserve necessary records of transactions and that The Cash Center Inc., The Loan Center Inc, and TLC were operating without a license from the Department as required under the CDDTL.

The Cash Center was ordered to stop operating a payday advance loan lending business without a license. Additionally, as part of this action, the Commissioner ordered that 87 illegal deferred deposit transactions arranged by Diego, totaling $21,870, be voided. Furthermore, the Commissioner has determined that Diego shall be required to pay a penalty of $35,000 ($2,500 per citation) to the Department.

The Cash Center’s main office is in the city of Reseda in Los Angeles County. The violations occurred at the Reseda location and were discovered by a Department of Corporations examiner.

As defined by state law, a deferred deposit transaction is a written transaction whereby one person gives funds to another person upon receipt of a personal check and it is agreed that the personal check shall not be deposited until a later date. These loans are sometimes referred to as “payday advances” or “payday loans.”

Sunday, July 15, 2007

Payday Advance Lenders Close Doorts

By Paul Rizzo
Payday Loan Writer

Sawbucks closed two of its three Klamath Falls locations in anticipation of the new state regulations that cap interest rates for payday loans.

The stores closed the last week of June.

Payday Lending There was previously no cap for loans, said Melissa Johnson, Sawbucks manager. “We’ve tried to work with our customers that used to have those higher loans.”

She is concerned about the impact on personal cash loan customers, saying many have no other lending options because of their credit histories.

Interest rate cap

The new law caps the interest rate at 36 percent, but also allows an origination fee of $10 per $100 loaned, though no more than $30 for any instant payday loan amount. Previous annual interest rates reached 520 percent.

Some stores, like QuickCheck are still open and have made changes to comply with the new law. Rent-A-Centers in Oregon closed all their financial services departments. Other stores, such as the Check ‘N’ Go chain, have closed several quick cash advance locations in Oregon. All three had locations in Klamath Falls.

“It was a fatal blow that the Legislature gave us,” said John Rabenold, corporate spokesman for Check ‘N’ Go.

Eventually, all 21 Check ‘N’ Go locations in Oregon will be closed. Some remain open while customers’ accounts are settled.

Jobs lost
About 60 employees of Oregon’s Check ‘N’ Go will lose their faxless payday advance jobs with the closures.

It’s unfortunate that the Legislature did not take into consideration the effect the new law has on employees or offer an incentive for retraining, Rabenold said. Closing two Sawbucks stores in Klamath Falls required laying off two employees. Both had been with the company for four years.

Johnson said because Sawbucks offers other services such as check cashing, Western Union, money orders and utility payments, the final store will probably remain open. Streamlining expenses will help, she said.

Meanwhile, she is researching impacts of a check cashing law that limits excessive fees of $5 or varying percentages from 2 percent to 3.5 percent, depending on what type of check is being cashed.

Friday, July 13, 2007

Virginia Payday Loan Debate: Not Over

By Paul Rizzo
Payday Loan Writer

Payday advance lenders dodged a legislative effort to reduce their usurious interest rates at this year’s General Assembly session. But Gov. Timothy M. Kaine signaled last week he hasn’t given up on leashing the industry.

The payday loan industry and its lobbyists survived a measure that would have capped interest rates on their loans at 36 percent - the same cap that applies to other lending institutions in the state.

Loan Agreement It sounds, however, as if the governor and lawmakers are ready to take another shot at lowering those no credit check payday loan lending interest rates. Speaking at a ceremony to mark the passage of tax-relief legislation for the poor, Kaine said the state must do more to help the working poor.

Without being specific, he said he would either propose or support additional restrictions on payday lenders.

“I am very committed to working with legislators to try to find meaningful ways to reform this industry so that people don’t dig themselves in deep and get taken advantage of at vulnerable moments of their lives,” he said. “I just really have it on my heart that people shouldn’t take advantage of folks who are poor when it comes to lending them money.”

Virgina payday loan lenders have flourished since 2002 when the state uncapped regulations on the industry allowing it to charge interest rates of as much as 400 percent on an annual basis.

A payday loan costs $15 for every $100 borrowed. The maximum loan amount is $500 and the typical term is one or two weeks. If renewed for a year, as is done in some cases, the interest rate hits 390 percent.

But that’s not the worst of it, as a number of legislators have pointed out. Many borrowers take out more than one such loan. Figures show that multiple loans can often end up creating a financial trap for the borrower. The only way out of that trap is to arrange for another loan. And the cash advance payday loan borrowers - often people who live from paycheck to paycheck - become entwined in a cycle of debt from which they cannot escape.

Foes and supporters of the payday lending business waged heated debates during the 2007 legislative session, but could not agree on how to reform it. Some lawmakers supported interest rate caps (36 percent) that the industry said would put them out of business. Others preferred limiting the number of loans a borrower could have at one time.

That would have created extended payment plans and forced lenders to make sure their customers did not have too many loans with other payday lenders.

Read the rest of this entry »

Thursday, July 12, 2007

No Sympathy for Oregon Payday Loan Lenders

By Paul Rizzo
Payday Loan Writer

The following is a paraphrased editorial from The Register-Guard in Oregon…

Dozens of fast payday loan and car title lenders have closed their doors across Oregon since a new state law capping their annual interest charges at 36 percent went into effect this month.

Boo hoo.

Well, not exactly. Few Oregonians are shedding any tears for an industry that claims it won’t stick around unless it can charge annual interest rates of 520 percent. Such rates were standard fare for providers of payday advance loans before the Legislature passed the much-needed usury cap earlier this year.

Payday Store Lender Theatrics are obviously involved here. An estimated 60 payday loan stores statewide have closed or surrendered their licenses since June 1. That leaves about 200 payday lenders still doing business under the new regulations. Because 29 other states have imposed interest rate caps similar to Oregon’s, it seems likely that the industry will adapt and continue to exist in this state, as it has elsewhere.

Some short-term, no fax cash advance lenders no doubt hope that the Legislature will reverse itself in the next session and allow them to resume charging the exorbitant interest rates that they used for a quarter century to prey on desperate and naive Oregonians.

They should think again. Oregonians are fed up with legalized loan sharking. The Legislature began regulating the industry last year after cities across the state began adopting their own ordinances, and a statewide coalition of religious groups and charities began preparing to put a statewide initiative measure on the ballot.

Not that anyone should expect the industry of bad credit payday loans to slink quietly into the night. In a special session last year, the Legislature clamped down on payday lenders. The industry quickly figured out how to sidestep the new regulations by offering new types of loans under different licenses.

That prompted the 2007 Legislature to impose a blanket interest rate limit on consumer loans of all types. Other than an outright ban on payday and car title loans, it’s the only proven way to keep predatory lenders from taking advantage of the poor and vulnerable.

Payday cash loan lenders continue to make the improbable argument that the new 36 percent cap and other new restrictions make it impossible for them to stay in business. That fails to explain how the industry has managed to survive in the other states that have adopted interest-rate caps similar to Oregon’s.

Short-term lenders also claim that the Legislature has left low-income borrowers with no way to obtain short-term loans. That’s simply untrue. A variety of lenders, in particular credit unions, offer short-term loans at lower rates and with fairer terms.

What the payday lenders really want is for Oregon to turn back the clock to 1981, when the state lifted all of its interest rate caps on personal loans. The move was intended to lift restraints on the consumer credit marketplace’s ability to self-regulate through competition, supply and demand. But the practical result was a seamy proliferation of short-term lenders who charged annual interest rates in excess of 500 percent.

Now, these short-term lenders have a simple choice: They can find a way to stay in business by offering consumers loans under the reasonable limits provided by the state’s new regulations. Or they can shutter their businesses and leave this state, muttering with every step about how unfairly they’ve been treated and how much they’ll be missed by cash-strapped Oregonians.

If they choose the latter, it’s doubtful anyone will shed any tears.